

Paperback: 416 pages
Publisher: Picador; Reprint edition (June 9, 2015)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1250069351
ISBN-13: 978-1250069351
Product Dimensions: 6.2 x 0.7 x 9.2 inches
Shipping Weight: 14.1 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars See all reviews (93 customer reviews)
Best Sellers Rank: #121,147 in Books (See Top 100 in Books) #52 in Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics & Government > United States > Judicial Branch #57 in Books > Law > Rules & Procedures > Courts #167 in Books > Law > Constitutional Law > General

This delightful, generous, jargon-free book treats controversy with clarity: selects key facts to outline the issues, paints three-dimensional portraits, not caricatures, of the justices, and ventures confidently into legal thickets, so those in the know will recognize the signposts, but newcomers won't be detoured or get lost. The writers' erudition, craft, and civic virtue lifts their work above most popular books about the law. Their work has the briskness but not the glibness of Malcolm Gladwell, the twin respect for the reader and the subject of Steven Jay Gould.It surprised me but made sense to learn that Scalia is more traditionalist than originalist, Breyer more technocrat than liberal, Kagan more cautious than activist. But the focus of the book is on rulings, not personalities, and here the writers function at their peak. I raced through the passages that describe the novel and narrow definition of corruption that justifies Citizens United, the three-century patchwork of sources that supports the court's changed view of the 2nd Amendment, the libertarian faith in structural safeguards as guarantors of individual rights. The book explains exactly what all this means with elegance and fairness.Those of us who consider the Roberts court lawless might wish the book focused more on precedent: how brazen it is, for example, in Citizens United to overturn a century of law in a 5-4 decision based on newly-minted theory; or acknowledged recent research that demonstrates the decisive role of personal prejudice in rulings by Republican-appointed judges. The day I write this, June 16, 2014, the New York Times has published a study showing they are far more likely to rule in favor of womens' rights if they themselves have daughters.
Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution Nora Roberts - Inn BoonsBoro Collection: The Next Always, The Last Boyfriend, The Perfect Hope (Nora Roberts Inn Boonsboro Trilogy) Nora Roberts - Bride Series: Books 1-4: Vision in White, Bed of Roses, Savor the Moment, Happy Ever After (Bride (Nora Roberts) Series) Nora Roberts - Collection: Birthright & Northern Lights & Blue Smoke (Nora Roberts CD Collection) The Penguin Guide to the United States Constitution: A Fully Annotated Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and Amendments, and Selections from The Federalist Papers Dissent and the Supreme Court: Its Role in the Court's History and the Nation's Constitutional Dialogue A Court of Mist and Fury (A Court of Thorns and Roses) The United States v. Nixon: The Watergate Scandal and Limits to US Presidential Power (Landmark Supreme Court Cases) (Landmark Supreme Court Cases (Abdo)) The Glittering Court: The Glittering Court, Book 1 The Chicago Seven Political Protest Trial: A Headline Court Case (Headline Court Cases) Scalia Dissents: Writings of the Supreme Court's Wittiest, Most Outspoken Justice Ethical Dilemmas and Decisions in Criminal Justice (Ethics in Crime and Justice) The 80/20 Investor: Investing in an Uncertain and Complex World - How to Simplify Investing with a Single Principle Uncertain Soldier Uncertain Glory The Laws of Medicine: Field Notes from an Uncertain Science (TED Books) The Fat Tail: The Power of Political Knowledge in an Uncertain World (with a New Preface) The Fat Tail: The Power of Political Knowledge in an Uncertain World Whiskey Neat: Uncertain Saints MC Series, Book 1 In an Uncertain World: Tough Choices from Wall Street to Washington