

Paperback: 306 pages
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (April 21, 2008)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0521694264
ISBN-13: 978-0521694261
Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.6 x 9 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
Best Sellers Rank: #1,134,464 in Books (See Top 100 in Books) #45 in Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Philosophy > Analytic Philosophy #2338 in Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Philosophy > History & Surveys #2625 in Books > Textbooks > Humanities > Philosophy > History & Surveys

I cannot help but echo the Notre Dame Philosophical Review's opinion: this is, indeed, a great book. Sure, there are flaws here and there, but that's nitpicking. Glock really does know his stuff, and he doesn't make any of the errors standard works on this topic do. He understands analytic philosophy, knows its competitors, and helps us to delimit the bounds of our own discipline.The book is essentially divided into three topics: historical hatchet-work, defenses of analytic philosophy, and substantive metaphilosophy. For anyone new to the field of analytic philosophy, he offers a nice overview of where we've come from. For those skeptical of it, he should help disabuse readers of some analytic monolith, or the bizarre yet widely repeated notion that analytic philosophy is positivistic. For those already in the tradition, he offers a great synoptic view of the discipline and some genuinely interesting metaphilosophical ruminations.Not only this: his writing style is clear, engaging, and entertaining. Indeed, there's a possibility he'll actually make reader smile. Even if you disagree with many of his more substantive points (indeed, I disagree with several major points he makes), nobody should pass up this book.The book is eminently readable by anyone with a modicum of interest in what philosophers do nowadays. There is no reason this book cannot be read by any intelligent reader, and, in my opinion, there is no reason that it shouldn't.
This reads like an essay for an introductory philosophy class. It is a lengthy list of citations and quotations from various philosophers with very little to tie them together. It offers all manner of opinions but gives you very little insght into them. The author offers no orignal opinions and conveys no real understading or insight into what he discusses. If I were given this as an assignment, I would give it a C.
Philosophy's Second Revolution: Early and Recent Analytic Philosophy The Story of Analytic Philosophy: Plot and Heroes (Routledge Studies in Twentieth-Century Philosophy) Contemporary Analytic Philosophy: Core Readings (2nd Edition) Redrawing the Lines: Analytic Philosophy, Deconstruction, and Literary Theory (Minnesota Archive Editions) Analytic Philosophy: An Anthology What is Analytic Philosophy? The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford Handbooks) A Brief History of Analytic Philosophy: From Russell to Rawls Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy Classics of Analytic Philosophy (Hackett Classics) The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy, Volume 1: The Founding Giants Fashionable Nihilism: A Critique of Analytic Philosophy Reading in The Philosophy of Religion: An Analytic Approach, 2nd Edition Heidegger's Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse and Authenticity in Being and Time (Modern European Philosophy) Analytic versus Continental: Arguments on the Methods and Value of Philosophy Analytic Philosophy in America: And Other Historical and Contemporary Essays What Philosophers Know: Case Studies in Recent Analytic Philosophy Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy (Current Controversies in Philosophy) Pink Floyd and Philosophy: Careful with that Axiom, Eugene! (Popular Culture and Philosophy) The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy (Cambridge Companions to Philosophy)