

Perfect Paperback: 338 pages
Publisher: Harper & Row, Publishers; 1st edition (1970)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0060904984
ISBN-13: 978-0061315459
ASIN: 0061315451
Product Dimensions: 5.3 x 0.8 x 8 inches
Shipping Weight: 12.2 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review: 4.4 out of 5 stars See all reviews (36 customer reviews)
Best Sellers Rank: #101,901 in Books (See Top 100 in Books) #62 in Books > History > Historical Study & Educational Resources > Historiography #71 in Books > Reference > Encyclopedias & Subject Guides > History #79 in Books > History > Historical Study & Educational Resources > Reference

David Hackett Fischer's thesis is that there is a tacit and analyzable logic of historical thought and that historians can improve their historical thinking by applying this logic to their work. Historians' Fallacies is a successful attempt to make history a discipline better governed by reason. Fischer notes that history is mainly a problem-solving discipline; the historian asks pertinent questions and then develops a logical paradigm to answer them. He acknowledges that history will never be an exact science but it is his goal, by a careful examination of common historical fallacies, to develop a type of logic. Method is necessary in history, and logic makes a method more rigorous and useful. The historian must follow rules to write good, "scientific," history. Fischer reveals his ultimate goal in his conclusion. He discusses the goals of history and makes an eloquent apology for the historian. He astutely notes that social scientists have never found a justification for history, making illogical arguments to justify their interest in the past. Calling history "fun," saying that history should be studied because it "is there," and stating "everyone needs to know facts" are three poor reasons for a defense of history. Likewise, claiming history provides a creative outlet and that it could prove useful for the future are spurious speculations, at best. Fischer's apology of history explains that as history becomes more logical, it becomes more useful to society. History can clarify the contexts of contemporary social problems and can help with forecasting, allowing us to discuss future issues before they arrive. History offers theoretical knowledge, helping social scientists understand past conditions that best brought, say, stability and peace.
...and then some The study of history carries with it a load of fascinating philosophical and epistemological questions. Beyond such generalities such as "what is the nature of truth?", historians have to decide which facts are relevant to the case they are studying, what are causes in history, and how to make a narrative, a book or a mathematical model, that will capture something significant of the world. All of these are interesting questions, but except peripherally, David Hackett Fischer doesn't discuss them. Rather, Fischer tries to track down specific fallacies that historians commit, and spell them out, apparently in order to help other scholars avoid them. "Historians' Fallacies" is basically a collection and a catalogue of errors, some well known ones, such as "the fallacy of post hoc, propter hoc" (following, therefore caused by, p. 166) or "the pathetic fallacy" (ascribing animate behavior to inanimate objects, pp. 190-193) and some as obscure as "the fallacy of indiscriminate pluralism" (enumerating multiple causes without discrimination, pp. 175-177). There are at least three commendable aspects to Fischer's study. First, Fischer is a fine writer, with remarkable turns of phrases: "Sir Lewis [Namier] was no enemy of chosenness in either facts or people. He was, indeed, a committed Zionist in both respects." (p. 69).Another is Fischer's willingness to name names. Too many critics prefer uses such as "many writers", etc, but although Fischer does occasionally shies away (such as in his discussion of ad hominem attacks pp.290-293), he's generally willing to openly criticize some leading historians and intellectuals. Nor does Fischer satisfy himself with attacking such usual suspects as Robert Fogel, Arthur Schlesinger Jr.
Historians' Fallacies : Toward a Logic of Historical Thought Hold That Thought For Kids: Capturing Precious Memories through Fun Questions, Images, & Conversations (Hold That Thought Keepsake Coversation ... That Thought Keepsake Conversation Journals) Crisis and Renewal: The Era of the Reformations (Westminster History of Christian Thought) (Westminster Histories of Christian Thought) (The Westminster History of Christian Thought) Redreaming America: Toward a Bilingual American Culture (SUNY Series in Latin American and Iberian Thought and Culture) Spiritual Snake Oil: Fads & Fallacies in Pop Culture Informal Logical Fallacies: A Brief Guide Economic Facts and Fallacies Don't Get Fooled!: How to Analyze Claims for Fallacies, Biases, and Other Deceptions Facts the Historians Leave Out: A Confederate Primer Herodotus and Sima Qian: The First Great Historians of Greece and China: A Brief History with Documents (Bedford Cultural Editions Series) The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past Does the Frontier Experience Make America Exceptional? (Historians at Work) Cornelius Nepos: On Great Generals. On Historians. (Loeb Classical Library No. 467) The Inuit Thought of It: Amazing Arctic Innovations (We Thought of It) Native American Thought of It: Amazing Inventions and Innovations (We Thought of It) The History of Islamic Political Thought, Second Edition: The History of Islamic Political Thought: From the Prophet to the Present Christianity and Western Thought: Journey to Postmodernity in the Twentieth Century: 3 (Christianity & Western Thought) Prolog ++: The Power of Object-Oriented and Logic Programming (International Series in Logic Programming) Modern Logic: A Text in Elementary Symbolic Logic Gre-Lsat Logic Workbook (Gre-Lsat Logic Workbook, 2nd ed)