

Series: Civil War America
Hardcover: 280 pages
Publisher: The University of North Carolina Press; First Edition edition (June 25, 2001)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 080782626X
ISBN-13: 978-0807826263
Product Dimensions: 9.5 x 6.4 x 0.8 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds
Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
Best Sellers Rank: #1,254,650 in Books (See Top 100 in Books) #103 in Books > History > Americas > United States > Civil War > Regimental Histories #1671 in Books > History > Americas > United States > Civil War > Campaigns & Battlefields #12619 in Books > History > Military > United States

This book apparently is a PhD dissertation that the author has brought out, possibly with some modification, into popular history. It is short (189 pages) with 64 pages of endnotes that actually add a fair amount of scholarly information if one cares to read through them. The basic premise is that Civil War soldiers made their regiments the primary fighting unit to which they were committed and would fight for to the end if unit integrity was kept intact. The problem with the book, is that premise falls into the "duh!" category as having been recognized for eons by Civil War historians and others. It is hardly a seminal conclusion. This is not anywhere close to McPherson's "Why They Fought." That being said, there is much good here. I will not reiterate the content -- that is covered well in the review by Durney. The good includes the mundane but critically important aspects of training at the regimental and company levels have been mostly ignored in the Civil War literature. The ability to maneuver under fire won many battles (the Wilderness comes to mind) and the lack thereof lost many (Fair Oaks for example.) The author provides a good introduction to this subject, but it needs a huge amount of fleshing out. I recommend Benjamin Scribner's work, "How Soldiers Were Made", now long out of print & difficult to find, to add to this discussion. In my own case, although I have ancestors who fought on both side of the Civil War, my Great-grandfather's diary covering his three years fighting as a member of Company "K", 5th Ohio Volunteer Cavalry (one of the units mentioned in this work), by itself proved the author's thesis concerning the importance of the Company and Regiment, as well as training.
This is a good account of the building of regiments and brigades in the early years of the war. Using the Army of the Ohio as a model, the author gives a good account of the raising, equipping and training of a regiment. This is the book's strongest point and much of its' value. If this justifies spending $37.50, is an open question. After reading the book, I'm not sure that I have an answer for you.The Army of the Ohio's role at Shiloh is still being debated. The author comes down firmly on saving Grant's army; over the secondary role many historians assign it. The question isn't debated as much as stated with little more than a nod to the other side. This caused no little upset with the reviewer, as it contradicted other histories without providing real answers as to why.The frustrations of campaigning between Shiloh and the invasion of Kentucky are explained. The army was used not so much as a weapon but as a construction crew. Isolated garrisons, poorly lead and badly trained were no match for the hard riding raiders of Morgan and Forrest. Both of these men built reputations at the expense of this army. The author manages to show how decisions made months before caused many of the problems at this time. Political appointees do not make a regimental commander or a fighter. More than one surrender caused army wide embarrassment and strained the fragile ties between units.Bragg's invasion of Kentucky, the political implications and the impact on the 1862 election are not developed. Neither is a good explanation of the battle of Perryville provided. Without reading Noe's excellent book, I'm not sure you can understand what is going on. This is the weakest part of the book and the most vital, as the army is really tested during this time.
All for the Regiment: The Army of the Ohio, 1861-1862 (Civil War America) Army of the Heartland: The Army of Tennessee, 1861--1862 The First Republican Army: The Army of Virginia and the Radicalization of the Civil War (A Nation Divided: Studies in the Civil War Era) Army Life in a Black Regiment (Collector's Library of the Civil War) A Broken Regiment: The 16th Connecticut's Civil War (Conflicting Worlds: New Dimensions of the American Civil War) Dispatches from Bermuda: The Civil War Letters of Charles Maxwell Allen, United States Consul at Bermuda, 1861-1888 (Civil War in the North) Soldiering in the Army of Tennessee: A Portrait of Life in a Confederate Army (Civil War America) Army at Home: Women and the Civil War on the Northern Home Front (Civil War America) The Songwriter Goes to War: The Story of Irving Berlin's World War II All-Army Production of This Is the Army Sons of Privilege: The Charleston Light Dragoons in the Civil War (Civil War Sesquicentennial Edition) (Civil War Sesquicentennial Edition (University of South Carolina Press)) A Brave Black Regiment: The History of the Fifty-Fourth Regiment of Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry 1863-1865 The Last Man and the Last Life: The bloody journey of the Philadelphia National Guards regiment from May 1861 to November 1864 War on the Waters: The Union and Confederate Navies, 1861-1865 (Littlefield History of the Civil War Era) War on the Waters: The Union and Confederate Navies, 1861-1865 (The Littlefield History of the Civil War Era) Butterflies and Skippers of Ohio (Bulletin of the Ohio Biological Survey New Series) Autumn of Glory: The Army of Tennessee, 1862--1865 Army Life in a Black Regiment: and Other Writings (Penguin Classics) "The Bloody Fifth"_The 5th Texas Infantry Regiment, Hood's Texas Brigade, Army of Northern Virginia: Volume 1: Secession to the Suffolk Campaign Antietam: The Maryland Campaign of 1862 : Essays on Union and Confederate Leadership (Civil War Regiments, Vol 5, No 3) Antietam 1862: The Civil War's Bloodiest Day (Campaign)